View Print Friendly Version | Close Window

CEPI - Commonwealth Educational Policy Institute
CEPI Publications: Articles

Holiday Turmoil: Law Doesn’t Ask Religious Purge

BILL BOSHER
TIMES-DISPATCH COLUMNIST Jan 14, 2001


December was a challenging month for schools. A time that should have brought joy and cheer frequently rang with calls of conflict and even threats of litigation. In a month with so many wonderful celebrations of religious and cultural origin, teachers and administrators have been excessively cautioned about permitting religion to get into the schools. While many young people and their families were celebrating religious holidays such as Christmas and Hanukkah or cultural festivals such as Kwanzaa, schools were asked to act as though the season did not exist.

Parents and educators in this country did not at some point in time get together and determine that young people needed a break from school in the winter and spring. In reality, school calendars were structured to represent two significant Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter. With the growth of different religions and cultures in our communities, schools found more euphemistic descriptions such as winter and spring breaks.

CONCERNS about Christmas in the schools were addressed with policies and practices that obliterated any discussion of religious holidays. Christmas concerts and plays became winter concerts and holiday plays with focus on Santa, reindeer, and gift-giving.

Organizations whose missions seem to be purging religion from public schools have used intimidation and myth to do what the courts have not done: Make schools religion-free. How do we teach people to understand each other while ignoring their faith and customs? Why should teachers be asked to ignore what students so obviously can see?

The First Amendment clearly prohibits the government from establishing a religion; however, the same Constitution protects us all in exercising our faith. In 1995, the American Jewish Congress, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Council of Churches, the National Association of Evangelicals, and many other denominational- and faith-based organizations issued Religion in the Public Schools: A Joint Statement of Current Law.

THESE guidelines, which must reflect the restrictions of common sense and reasonable practice, very closely resemble publications of the National PTA, the U.S. Department of Education, and the Virginia Board of Education:

  • Students may pray, read their scriptures, discuss their faith, and invite others to join their religious group.

  • Religious symbols may be displayed as part of the academic program. Sacred music may be sung or played as part of a school’s academic program. The use of music, art, drama, or literature with religious themes is permissible if used in an educational way.

  • Students may wear religious clothing and display religious symbols in school.

  • Students may distribute religious literature on public-school campuses.

In introducing the “Joint Statement” on its website, the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews (www.ifcj.org) also noted that in the pressure to make schools “religion-free,” many young people had been erroneously asked not to pray at lunch, write about religious themes, hand out literature with biblical quotes, and give Christmas gifts to their classmates. This same misinterpretation of the First Amendment prompted a local principal to inform a parent that even though it was his turn to read to his child’s class, he could not use the “Christmas Story.”

WHILE THIS issue is difficult for schools, it is also a challenge for our communities. Certainly no one would ask that a teacher or administrator hide his or her faith in order to work in schools. We should guard equally against leaving young people puzzled about what they see in us at church or the synagogue and in the classroom. It is perhaps better to let young people know that we have a faith and risk the potential of their emulation than to say to them that we have no faith at all.

For my family, December brought focus to the center of our faith, the birth of Jesus Christ. At the core of Christianity is caring for your neighbor. If this transcends from belief to virtue for us, then it also would include recognizing, understanding, and loving those who think differently. Perhaps that is what President Clinton had in mind two years ago, when he said, “Schools do more than train children’s minds. They also help to nurture their souls by reinforcing the values they learn at home and in their communities. . . . The First Amendment has protected our religious freedom and allowed faiths to flourish in our homes, in our work place, and in our schools . . . .”

Perhaps now is the time to prepare for next season.



Bill Bosher, executive director of the Commonwealth Educational Institute at VCU, completes his year-long stint as a 2000 Commentary Columnist with this column.

Back to Top

 

 

View Print Friendly Version| Close Window